Lawsuits by Casino
Workers
from:
Trends
in Smokefree Gaming
By Karen
Blumenfeld, Esq.
Director, Tobacco Control Policy and Legal Resource Center
January 31, 2006
Concern
about being sued by a worker who is getting sick from secondhand
smoke can motivate employers to change their smoking policies.
Employees around the globe are becoming sick from secondhand
smoke, and are taking their employers to court. Generally
speaking, most cases settle of out court and are not reported.
However, here are some settlements and decisions of legal
cases brought by casino workers:
- In
response to a Montreal casino's pregnant worker, whose union
supported her, the casinos voluntarily went smokefree. Starting
in 2006, the Quebec province's smokefree law will be in
effect, including in casinos.
- In
June 2002, a class action employee lawsuit over the air
quality of the Kenner riverboat casino in Louisiana was
settled. Employees alleged that the ventilation system on
the vessel was faulty and re-circulated smoky air, making
them sick. One thousand current and former Treasure Chest
employees will receive money from the $2.6 million settlement.
- In
Ontario Canada, in April 2005, an ex-casino worker was awarded
employment insurance benefits; he had to quit his job because
he was getting sick from ETS on the job. He is 36 years
old and worked at Casino Rama for six years.
- In
Halifax Canada, in May 2003, a female casino worker was
the first Canadian to win employment insurance benefits.
- In
January 2004, an employee of the Napoleon's Casino in London,
where he worked as an inspector for fourteen years, settled
for almost $100,000.
A plethora
of cases exists throughout the United States on worker health
protection. In New Jersey, employees have won cases that have
involved secondhand smoke in the workplace. Decisions have
included a mandate for a smokefree workplace, if there is
not statute that requires it, as in the 1976 New Jersey case,
Shimp v. NJ Bell (office setting), or a workers compensation
award as in Magaw v. Middletown Board of Education. In New
York, a state prison employee won a major monetary award in
his case, McKinney v. Anderson.
Employees
may bring challenges under the federal Americans with Disabilities
Act, and/or a state law version (but not in Native American
casinos, which are exempt under the term "'employer"
in the ADA statute).
This
page updated November 9, 2006
|